Unfounded: For real change, we need more than internal police reviews

Unfounded: For real change, we need more than internal police reviews
Elizabeth Sheehy is professor of law at the University of Ottawa. Teresa Scassa is the Canada Research Chair in information law at the University of Ottawa. The Globe and Mail’s investigative series Unfounded offers an unprecedented opportunity for change at the level of police investigations of sexual assault. The journalism reveals the breadth and depth of the problem, and makes clear to ordinary Canadians that practices of unfounding not only cause tremendous harm to thousands of women who report, but also leave the rest of us endangered by predators who remain insulated from accountability for their crimes. At the same time, this is a dangerous moment. At least 32 police departments across the country have committed to reviewing their data, but the overwhelming majority are focused on internal reviews – not reviews that render their practices transparent, accountable and open to long-term and sustainable change. Unfounded: How police and politicians have responded to The Globe’s investigation so far Unfounded: Police dismiss 1 in 5 sexual assault claims as baseless, Globe investigation reveals Interactive: Will the police believe you? Compare unfounded sex assault rates across Canada What is so bad, one might reasonably ask, about internal review? Isn’t it better than nothing? Internal review allows police departments to characterize the problem as simply one of data mismanagement. They re-classify cases previously in the “unfounded” box to “insufficient evidence to proceed.” While the new label might alleviate distress for women who report rape, it will effectively immunize police from external scrutiny, allowing them to avoid critical questions about whether professional and thorough investigations are conducted and how women are interviewed and informed about police decisions. Police can diffuse any pressure to improve the very low charge rate for sexual assault by asserting that the problem is resolved. Only the Philadelphia model, tried and tested over years to the praise of both police and women’s advocates, holds the potential for real and sustainable change. It requires long-term partnership between police and advocates for women who have experienced violence. Together, they regularly review all unfounded files and a random sample of files otherwise closed so that experts can ask questions and identify investigative failures or the distorting influence of myths and stereotypes. When done on a timely basis, police have the opportunity to re-open files, complete investigations and lay charges. Both police and advocates benefit from learning from each other’s expertise. The model has produced dramatic results in Philadelphia and other U.S. cities: lower unfounding rates, more sophisticated investigations, higher charge rates, better prepared prosecutors and increased public confidence in police. That is why it is commonly referred to as the “gold standard” for sexual assault investigations. To succeed, the Philadelphia model depends on the participation of front-line advocates who are completely independent of police and knowledgeable about local conditions and challenges, expert in violence against women, accountable to their own organizations for their work and bound by confidentiality oaths that meet or exceed those imposed on police. They must have access to the complete files – nothing redacted – or they will be unable to provide authoritative feedback and police will always be able to rely on superior yet undisclosed “information” to justify their decisions. Police across Canada argue that privacy laws prevent the adoption of the Philadelphia model. But is this a valid concern? While privacy laws do prevent government actors from disclosing personal information through Access to Information requests, the Philadelphia model does not rely on access to information. Participants in the review of files would have the status of consultants and would be bound by confidentiality agreements. These would be in accordance with standard practices already in place for outside consultants. Privacy is a crucial value, but it is not compromised in the Philadelphia model. It should not be used as a red herring to deflect transparency and oversight. As the Unfounded series clearly demonstrates, such transparency and oversight are sorely needed. Canadians too deserve the “gold standard” for sexual assault investigations. Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeDebate

5 thoughts on “Unfounded: For real change, we need more than internal police reviews

  1. I precisely had to thank you so much yet again. I am not sure the things that I would have followed without those concepts contributed by you regarding that topic. It has been a real traumatic condition in my position, however , understanding this professional approach you managed the issue made me to weep for joy. I will be happier for the advice and thus expect you are aware of a great job your are getting into teaching the mediocre ones thru your websites. I’m certain you’ve never come across all of us.

  2. I precisely wished to thank you very much all over again. I’m not certain the things that I would’ve handled without the type of information revealed by you directly on such a theme. It seemed to be a real challenging condition in my opinion, nevertheless being able to view your specialised tactic you processed that made me to jump over happiness. I’m just grateful for the guidance as well as hope you know what a great job you have been doing training most people thru your website. I am certain you haven’t got to know any of us.

  3. I enjoy you because of all of the work on this site. My aunt loves carrying out research and it’s really easy to see why. Almost all notice all concerning the dynamic means you create important tactics by means of the web blog and as well increase response from the others about this matter then our favorite child is truly studying a whole lot. Have fun with the remaining portion of the new year. You’re carrying out a fabulous job.

  4. An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing just a little evaluation on this. And he in truth bought me breakfast because I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If doable, as you change into expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more details? It’s extremely helpful for me. Huge thumb up for this blog post!

  5. Thank you so much for giving everyone remarkably nice possiblity to read in detail from here. It’s usually so nice and also stuffed with a great time for me and my office mates to search your website the equivalent of thrice every week to see the fresh stuff you will have. Of course, I’m also at all times happy for the wonderful secrets you serve. Selected 1 ideas in this article are undoubtedly the finest I have ever had.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *